Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2577 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT - 115 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Performs up to 264% better in Monster Hunter: World than Radeon R7 260X - 200 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 16 vs 2 GB
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,301 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
6.111111111111112%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
8.555555555555555%
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
$139 | MSRP | $999 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1825 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |