Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 4GB OC Edition GDDR6 Gaming Grafikkarte (NVIDIA Turing Architektur, 4GB GDDR6 Speicher, PCIe 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a, DUAL-GTX1650-O4GD6-P-EVO)

Buy for 153.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 522 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 4GB OC Edition GDDR6 Gaming Grafikkarte (NVIDIA Turing Architektur, 4GB GDDR6 Speicher, PCIe 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a, DUAL-GTX1650-O4GD6-P-EVO)

Buy for 153.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 522 minutes ago

Availability

MSRP in USD: $109

No items available

Availability

MSRP in USD: $149

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1953 days newer than Radeon R7 260.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 30% better in Deathloop than Radeon R7 260 - 61 vs 47 FPS
  • Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 75 vs 95 Watts
  • Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 4 vs 2 GB
This is a free version of Deathloop.
Deathloop

Deathloop

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R7 260 Logo
Radeon R7 260

Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013


FPS

47

77%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

61

100%

Value, €/FPS

€2.52/FPS

100%

Price, €

€153.9

100%

FPS and Value Winner

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 4GB OC Edition GDDR6 Gaming Grafikkarte (NVIDIA Turing Architektur, 4GB GDDR6 Speicher, PCIe 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a, DUAL-GTX1650-O4GD6-P-EVO)

Buy for 153.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 522 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R7 260 Logo
Radeon R7 260

Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R7 260 Logo
Radeon R7 260

Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013


Pixel Fillrate

16 GPixel/s

30%

Texel Fillrate

48 GTexel/s

51%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R7 260 Logo

AMD Radeon R7 260

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Dec 17th, 2013Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Volcanic IslandsGenerationGeForce 16
$109
MSRP$149
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pinPower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2 GBMemory
4 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR5
128-bitBus128-bit
96 GB/sBandwidth
128.1 GB/s
1000 MHzBase Clock Speed
1485 MHz
Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1665 MHz
1500 MHzMemory Clock Speed
2001 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R7 260 or GeForce GTX 1650

Deathloop, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.