Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 55 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Radeon R7 250 - 57 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
57
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €156.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |