Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 5100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 826 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Up to 2% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €498.0 vs €510.37
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 75 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 2300% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 24 vs 1 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €498 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74126 minutes ago
Buy for €510.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
40.90160075329567%
Texel Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
71.57151265450264%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$499 | MSRP | $279 |
4x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
713 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1086 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |