Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 834 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 23% better in Dota 2 than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 186 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 6 vs 4 GB
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€226.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €226.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
45%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $279 |
4x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1125 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1201 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |