Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 758 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 4% better in Diablo IV than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 55 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €144.31 vs €379.95
- Up to 63% better value when playing Diablo IV than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - €2.62 vs €7.17 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €144.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56491 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
53
96.36363636363636%
Value, €/FPS
€7.17/FPS
36.541143654114364%
Price, €
€379.95
37%
Buy for €379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56491 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
94.11196911196912%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
94.13610038610038%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |