Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6600 is 707 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Performs up to 32% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 78 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 48% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6600 - €139.03 vs €269.83
- Up to 32% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro W6600 - €2.36 vs €3.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6600 - 65 vs 100 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.46/FPS
68%
Price, €
€269.83
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €269.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
59
75%
Value, €/FPS
€2.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
14%
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$649 | MSRP | $199 |
4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
2580 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |