Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6600 is 777 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Performs up to 43% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 - 73 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 51% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6600 - €144.99 vs €293.69
- Up to 29% better value when playing Elden Ring than Radeon Pro W6600 - €2.84 vs €4.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6600 - 75 vs 100 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
70%
Price, €
€293.69
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €293.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14575 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
69%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €144.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14575 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
32%
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$649 | MSRP | $149 |
4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2580 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |