Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 932 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 31% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 88 vs 67 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 50 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 40% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - €128.9 vs €214.12
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73985 minutes ago
Buy for €128.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73986 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
27.77852259015954%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
37.03306523681859%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |