Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1042 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Radeon Pro W6400 - 107 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - €201.0 vs €224.48
- Up to 18% better value when playing Rust than Radeon Pro W6400 - €1.88 vs €2.29 per FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €224.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €201 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
71%
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |