Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1042 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield V than Radeon Pro W6400 - 129 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - €101.16 vs €214.12
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74087 minutes ago
Buy for €101.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74088 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
87.05648926237161%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
71.2285168682368%
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |