Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1411 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 24% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon 680M - 199 vs 161 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€549.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €549.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 6 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 192-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |