Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 135 days newer than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 50 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 2% better in League of Legends than Radeon 680M - 376 vs 367 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
376
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€458.23
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
57.84716516023008%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
30.62645011600928%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 16 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |