Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 3171 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 50 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 3 than Radeon 680M - 148 vs 141 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon 680M
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
58%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
92%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
