Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 3045 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 50 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Radeon 680M - 66 vs 63 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |