Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3137 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 192 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |