Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 35% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 208 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
