Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 187 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |