Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3403 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 248 vs 208 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |