Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2613 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 121 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |