Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3403 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v2.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 131 vs 113 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$289.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$289.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |