Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3038 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v2.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 79% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 472 vs 264 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
