Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2290 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 22% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 260 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
