Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2399 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 195 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |