Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1240 - 590 vs 507 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
