Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3504 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1240 - 557 vs 507 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
557
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$209 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |