Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3788 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 69 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 201 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1046 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |