The Ryzen 7 2700 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900, however, it's a better value for money, as it's CA$398.88 cheaper!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 58% cheaper – CA$290.00 vs CA$688.88
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i9-9900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 7 2700 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-9900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
95%
Min 1% FPS
120
95%
Price, CA$
CA$290
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.61/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, CA$
CA$688.88
42%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.62/FPS
44%
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-9900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $423.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
