Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$120.00 vs CA$271.20
- Up to 36% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.36 vs CA$0.56 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 488 vs 329 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
329
67%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7278 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$271.2
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$271.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7551 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |