In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 3 2200U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 3 2200U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2018
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 2200U
Jan 8th, 2018
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 3 2200U Jan 8th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $509.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
