Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5690 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5690 is 2605 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Performs up to 1% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 70 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
69
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |