Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3201 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon X5690 - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |