Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 2150 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5675 - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
