Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 930 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Xeon X5675 - 194 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |