Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2621 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5675 - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |