Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 993 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 0% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1610 - 204 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
