Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2761 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 18% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W3690 - 294 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
294
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
Gulftown | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |