Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3065 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 21% better in War Thunder than Xeon W3690 - 164 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$173.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$173.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Gulftown | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |