Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 3325 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon W3680 - 422 vs 375 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
422
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |