Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3698 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon W3680 - 112 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$370.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$370.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |