Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3680 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3680 is 575 days older than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than FX-8120 - 677 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
