Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon W3570 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3887 days newer than Xeon W3570.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3570
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon W3570 - 470 vs 452 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3570 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3570 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon W3570
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3570 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
