Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3075 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3565 - 215 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |