Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 3055 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon W3520 - 242 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 32 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$999.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$999.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |