Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 103 days older than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 56 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W-3175X - 137 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 95 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 6 |
56 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |