Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 456 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 56 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W-3175X - 136 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 95 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$234.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$234.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 6 |
56 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |