Buy on Amazon
CA$330
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E5620 - 182 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$330
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
