Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4578 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 92% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5620 - 261 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
261
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$718.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$718.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |