Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i7-10700F

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i7-10700F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700F

2.9 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for CA$422.27 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 243 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700F

2.9 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for CA$422.27 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 243 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1283 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 44 vs 16 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F

  • Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 135 vs 127 FPS
  • Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
This is a free version of Dying Light 2: Stay Human.
Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016


FPS

127

94%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

135

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$3.13/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$422.27

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for CA$422.27 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 243 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016


Single-Core

1175

72%

Multi-Core

9619

100%

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1612

100%

Multi-Core

7231

75%

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4

vs
Intel Core i7-10700F Logo

Intel Core i7-10700F

Oct 25th, 2016Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5CollectionCore i7
BroadwellCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket 2011-3SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
22
Cores8
44
Threads16
2.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.8 GHz
145 WTDP
65 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
24.0xMultiplier
29.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Xeon E5-2699A v4 or Core i7-10700F

Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.