Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1351 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 2% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 207 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
67.95835743204164%
Multi-Core
9619
95.90229312063808%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |