Buy on Amazon
CA$549.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 275 days older than Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 103 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Acer Chromebook Plus Laptop with Google AI | 14" WUXGA 1920 x 1200 IPS Touch Display | AMD Ryzen 3 7320C | 8GB LPDDR5X | 128GB eMMC | Wi-Fi 6E | Chrome OS | CB514-3HT-R8RB
Buy for CA$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
83.74468085106383%
Multi-Core
2834
29.462522091693522%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
